![]() |
Rivista di Massoneria - Revue de Franc-Maçonnerie - Revista de Masonerìa - Revista de Maçonaria |
---|
History Literature Music Art Architecture Documents Rituals Symbolism |
![]() |
![]() MASONIC PAPERSby W.Bro. TONY POPEIRISH MASONRY IN TASMANIAA paper presented to Faith and Lewis Lodge No 9 SAC on 9/3/94. |
Introduction Brethren, your
Worshipful Master has been a frequent visitor to the South Australian Lodge of
Research, and learned that I am writing a book about Freemasonry in Tasmania.
When he asked me to speak to you tonight and tell you something of the Craft in
that beautiful island, I wondered which of the many stories would interest
you most. Then I thought of your own origins, as the East Torrens Lodge of
Faith, 408 IC, and the answer was clear. I shall talk about Irish Freemasonry in
Tasmania. Ireland is often
forgotten or underrated as a source of Freemasonry throughout the world, but it
was an Irish invention which was largely responsible for the spread of Masonry
outside of Europe. In 1730 the Grand Lodge of Ireland invented the document
called a Warrant or Charter, and two years later had the brilliant idea of
issuing a movable warrant—that is to say, a warrant for the lodge to
meet wherever the members happened to be. They issued these warrants to brethren
who wished to form lodges in the British army units stationed in Ireland. When
the units moved, they took the warrant and the lodge paraphernalia with them.
Thus, the soldier Masons took their Freemasonry to North America, the West
Indies, Africa, India, China and Australasia. Irish regulations prohibited the
initiation of military candidates in ‘town’ lodges if there was a military
lodge in the vicinity, or the initiation of civilians in a military lodge if a
town lodge met nearby. These regulations, of course, only applied to Irish
lodges. The regulations also required the lodges with movable warrants to place
themselves under the local jurisdiction of any existing Grand Lodge wherever
they might go. The other Grand
Lodges of the British Isles—first Scotland, then the Antients, and finally the
Moderns, copied the idea of the warrant and the movable warrant, but the
majority of military warrants were Irish. Tasmania Exactly when
Freemasonry came to Van Diemen’s Land is open to conjecture. Newspapers and
other sources indicate the presence of Masons and Masonic activity in 1804,
1814, 1819 and 1824.[1]
Two regiments of the British army, with units garrisoned in Hobart during this
period, contained lodges with Irish warrants. They were the 46th of Foot (Duke
of Cornwall’s Light Infantry), from 1814 to 1818, and the 48th of Foot
(Northamptonshire Regiment) from 1817 to 1824.[2] However, the first
authenticated meeting of a regular lodge in Hobart was in 1825. Thornton’s
Lodge, number 284 on the register of the Grand Lodge of Ireland, was attached to
the 40th of Foot (South Lancashire Regiment), with members stationed in Hobart
from 1825 to 1830. This lodge met in a private room of an hotel (quite a usual
practice in the 18th and early 19th centuries), and initiated local settlers
into Freemasonry.[3]
This was quite lawful, because there was no town lodge. The first civilian
lodge, Tasmanian Lodge, was formed in 1828 and worked under a dispensation
from Thornton’s Lodge until the arrival of its own warrant in 1831. In turn,
Tasmanian Lodge sponsored a second civilian lodge, Brotherly Union, in 1832, and
in 1834 a third ‘Irish’ lodge was formed, Tasmanian Operative Lodge. The
driving force behind the establishment of these civilian lodges and a permanent
home for Freemasonry in Van Diemen’s Land was Robert Lathrop Murray, who
became known as ‘the father of Tasmanian Freemasonry’.[4] The
Father of Tasmanian Freemasonry Soldier, bigamist,
policeman, businessman, journalist, convicted forger and country gentleman—the
‘father of Tasmanian Freemasonry’ was all of these. He was born in England
in 1777 and christened Robert William Lathropp. He was educated at Westminster
School and Cambridge University. When he came of age he assumed the surname
Murray, claiming descent from Sir William Murray, a Scottish baronet. He later
changed his name to Robert Lathrop Murray, and this is the name under which he
was always known in Australia.[5] Murray joined the
army at 18 and, as a junior officer serving in Ireland, he was made a Mason in a
lodge with an Irish military warrant. He became Master of his lodge at the age
of 24, and obtained what are often called ‘higher degrees’ in Orders closely
related to Freemasonry. Brother Murray served in the Peninsula War as equerry to
the Duke of Kent, in the army commanded by Sir Arthur Wellesley (the Duke of
Wellington). It was during his
earlier service in Ireland that Murray married Alicia Marshall, by whom he had a
daughter. Then in England in 1801, he married Catherine Clarke, by whom he also
had a daughter. Later he had a son, Edward Kent Strathearn Murray, whose
godfather was the Duke of Kent. Murray is said to have married his son’s
mother, Lydia Marriott, in 1806. The point of all this genealogy is that in 1815
Captain Murray was charged with bigamy, by going through a form of marriage with
Catherine Clarke while still married to Alicia. Murray’s defence was that he
did not consider the Irish marriage legal. Catherine and several highly placed
friends supported him, but he was convicted and sentenced to transportation to
New South Wales for seven years. No charge was laid in relation to Lydia. Murray was granted
a pardon in New South Wales in 1816, and was employed as a clerk and constable
of the Sydney bench. He was promoted to principal clerk in the police office,
and to assistant superintendent in 1820. He came to Hobart
the following year on a business venture, accompanied by a married woman. He
angered Governor Arthur by flaunting this relationship and by his subsequent
association with the Attorney-General.[6]
It was not long before letters began to be published in the local press, signed
‘a Colonist’, which were critical of Arthur and his administration. Murray
acknowledged authorship of these letters at a public function, when he rose to
respond to a toast to ‘a Colonist’! In 1825 he was
appointed editor of the Colonial Times, whose publisher shared Murray’s
views. The government responded to continuing attacks in this paper by jailing
not Murray but the publisher, Andrew Bent, for libel. It then imposed a tax on
newspapers and required publishers to be licensed. The Colonial Times was
unable to secure a licence, and ceased publication. However, when news of this
attempt to control the press reached England, the Colonial Secretary ordered the
tax and the licensing system to be withdrawn. Murray continued
his business ventures and suffered a liquidity problem, which brought him before
the Supreme Court on two charges of forgery. In October 1826 he was found not
guilty of one charge, but guilty of the other.[7]
This would have been the end of a lesser man, for forgery was a capital offence
in those days, but Murray survived and prospered. Precisely what happened is not
clear, but the court records show that sentence was postponed several times and,
eight months after conviction, Murray was pardoned by Governor Arthur.[8]
Five months after his reprieve, Murray married a local girl, Eleanor Dixon, who
subsequently bore him three sons and four daughters. When Murray returned to
journalism a few weeks after his marriage, his new publications, the Austral–Asiatic
Review and the Tasmanian, were more moderate in tone, and tended to
favour Governor Arthur. It was in this
trying period that Brother Murray renewed his Masonic activities. As a former
army officer, himself initiated in a military lodge with an Irish warrant, he
was a welcome visitor to Thornton’s Lodge, attached to the South Lancashire
Regiment. He introduced other colonists to the lodge and appendant Royal Arch
chapter, and in 1827 he obtained from Thornton’s Lodge a dispensation to form
Tasmanian Lodge, which began to meet in the following year. It was he who sought
dispensations to form the other civilian lodges, Brotherly Union and Tasmanian
Operative, and installed their first Masters. The South
Lancashire Regiment was transferred to India in 1830, and Thornton’s Lodge
departed with it. The 63rd of Foot (Manchester Regiment), stationed in Van
Diemen’s Land from 1830 to 1834, also had an Irish warrant, and the regimental
surgeon, William Bohan, held the rank of Past Provincial Grand Master. In
1832, the two civilian lodges, Tasmanian Lodge and the Lodge of Brotherly Union,
wrote to the Grand Lodge of Ireland, recommending the appointment of Brother
Bohan as Provincial Grand Master for Tasmania.[9]
While awaiting the reply, which never arrived, Bohan proceeded to establish a
Provincial Grand Lodge, with the Masters and Wardens of the two lodges as his
grand officers. Although this
unofficial Provincial Grand Lodge ceased to exist when Brother Bohan departed
for India with his regiment in 1834, the grand idea remained. After the
formation of Tasmanian Operative Lodge, the three civilian lodges again
petitioned the Grand Lodge of Ireland for a Provincial Grand Lodge, recommending
Robert Lathrop Murray as their Provincial Grand Master. The Duke of Leinster,
Grand Master of Ireland, was opposed to the establishment of Provincial Grand
Lodges outside the mother country. He refused the Bohan petition, which the
Grand Lodge of Ireland had recommended, and he refused the Murray petition. A
more modest form of local self-regulation was subsequently adopted, a Standing
Committee. The 21st of Foot,
known at the time as the Royal North British Fuzileers, and later as the Royal
Scots Fusiliers, arrived in the colony in December 1833. It brought with it a
lodge that had been at work for a century, off and on, with Irish warrant number
33. Robert Murray and several other civilians joined this lodge to strengthen
its numbers. In turn, the 21st
of Foot was scheduled to move to India in 1838. Some members of the lodge,
having completed their military service, elected to stay as settlers. Those
going with the regiment were too few to keep the lodge active, and it was
decided to leave the warrant with the brethren in Hobart. Eventually, permission
was granted by the Grand Lodge of Ireland, and Robert Lathrop Murray became the
first civilian Master of the lodge, in 1842. By virtue of the
age of its warrant, this lodge was clearly the most senior of the four Irish
lodges meeting in Hobart, so the lodges formed a Standing Committee with the
Master of number 33, Brother Murray, as chairman. The committee performed most
of the administrative functions of a Provincial Grand Lodge, and continued until
1875, outliving its first chairman and three of the four founding lodges. Members of the
Lodge of Brotherly Union, exasperated by the time taken in communication with
the Grand Lodge of Ireland, obtained a warrant to form a lodge under the United
Grand Lodge of England, to be known as Tasmanian Union Lodge. It is ironic that,
although the lodge began work under dispensation in 1844, it was not until 1848
that the warrant was received from England. The first Master, Charles Toby, had
the strange ambition of working the lodge under two constitutions, English and
Irish, but Robert Murray put a stop to that and the Irish warrant was revoked in
1845. Meanwhile, in
1842, the English parliament had passed legislation about Irish marriages which
gave Murray hope that his conviction for bigamy could be overturned, and in 1847
he returned to England to claim his inheritance. He died at his English country
seat in 1850. St
John’s Lodge and the Synagogue The first lodge in
the north of the island was St John’s Lodge, erected at Launceston in January
1843 under a dispensation granted by Tasmanian Operative Lodge in Hobart. In the
same month, the Jewish community in Launceston decided that the time was right
to build a synagogue, and they addressed a petition to the Governor for a grant
of land for this purpose. Subsequent events led to an unusual demonstration of
brotherhood.[10] One of the first
Masons to join the new lodge was Samuel Fox, Quartermaster of the 96th Regiment
of Foot (2nd Manchester), whose headquarters was at Launceston. A few months
later he was elected Master of the lodge.[11]
The commandant, Lt Col Cumberland, may also have been a Mason, but he did not
join the lodge. The Jewish
petition for a land grant was refused by Governor Sir John Franklin, and this
was interpreted by the local newspapers and the general populace as religious
bigotry. The Jews launched an appeal for funds to buy land for the synagogue,
and received generous and widespread support.[12] It was decided to
make the laying of the foundation stone a gala occasion. On Tuesday, 1 October
1844 (the 18th day of Tishri, 5605, by the Jewish calendar), a crowd assembled
in pouring rain for the event. A procession was formed outside the meeting place
of St John’s Lodge, led by the band of the 96th of Foot, followed by the
brethren of the lodge in full regalia, with the members of the Jewish building
committee in their midst and the remainder of the Jewish congregation at the
rear. The band played Masonic airs, Burns’ Farewell and The Entered
Apprentice, and led the way along St John Street to the chosen land. The
lodge minutes record: On arriving at the
ground, suitable prayers were offered up to the Great Architect of the Universe,
and a Masonic Anthem, expressly compiled for the occasion, was sung by the
brethren, accompanied by the Military Band. After the laying
of the foundation stone and dedication by the President of the congregation,
Benjamin Francis, assisted by the Master of the lodge, Samuel Fox, they all
reassembled and marched back behind the band. As Regimental
Quartermaster and Worshipful Master, Samuel Fox provides an obvious link between
the regiment and the lodge, but personal links between the lodge and the
congregation are more difficult to establish. It is possible, of course, that
Samuel Fox was a Jew. There are no contemporary Jewish records of the period,
and Masonic records do not indicate religious affiliation. Benjamin Francis may
have been a Mason. There are three subsequent references in the lodge minutes,
in the period 1845–48, to a Mason with the surname of Francis[13],
and some of the phrases used by Benjamin Francis in his address at the laying of
the foundation stone had a decidedly Masonic flavour.[14]
Judge for yourselves from this report of his address: “My Hebrew
Brethren and Christian
Friends—The
unspeakable and deeply felt pleasure this occasion affords me, can only be known
by the great being for whose worship and adoration we are met to found this
temple. In the outpouring of my heart at this time, I thank God we are assembled
even in the earth’s furthest limits, I may almost say in the wilderness, to
cement by brotherly love the bonds which have before-time bound the Hebrew
community alike, amidst the fiercest political tyranny and the bitterest
religious persecution. The bright sun of modern intelligence, however, is fast
dissipating the noisome vapours of intolerance and bigotry, and mankind now
learn, that their social, moral and religious happiness depend, not in religious
dominancy, but rather in the exercise of love, benevolence and good will from
one to the other. The example my christian friends have given this day of the
absence of religious bigotry will be known in all lands, and shall be remembered
when the pulsation of these generous hearts shall repose in their cold grave.
May this day then join us in brotherly love and good feeling, and may the
Almighty bless us with a contrite heart, health, happiness and prosperity. The only other
apparent link between the lodge and the congregation is Charles Alexander
William Rocher. He arrived in Tasmania in 1829 at the age of 16, was married in
Hobart in 1839, became a barrister in 1841 and then practised at Launceston.[15]
He was among the signatories of the petition rejected by Governor Franklin[16],
but it does not follow that he was a Jew. He may have become involved simply in
a professional capacity, in drafting the petition. Nor does the fact that he was
buried in a Christian graveyard in 1877[17]
prove that he was not a Jew. Rocher was not a member of the lodge in 1844, but
he was almost certainly a Mason at that time. He was elected a joining member of
the lodge in 1850.[18]
To become a joining member, he must have already been a Mason, and there was no
other lodge in the north. The strong inference is that he was initiated in one
of the Hobart lodges between about 1830 and 1841. Conclusion Tasmanian
Operative Lodge, in Hobart, and St John’s Lodge, in Launceston, had their
problems, but they survived. The other Irish Lodges, all in the south, ceased
work before your mother lodge was consecrated. An Irish lodge was formed in the
middle of the island, but it only lasted a few years. In the 1880s several other
Irish lodges were formed in the north of Tasmania and some of these survived. Another time,
perhaps, I shall be able to tell you of the Tasmanian Masons, including many
from the Irish lodges, who formed a Masonic Rifle Company, and officered several
other military units formed to defend the colony when the British troops were
withdrawn, and also the story of Harry Conway, who became the Provincial Grand
Master, Irish Constitution. Of course, there
were English and Scottish lodges in Tasmania, and eventually they all combined
into the Grand Lodge of Tasmania—but for those stories (some of which would
curl your hair) you will have to wait until the book is published. NOTES [2] Wiseman AR, Freemasonry in Tasmania 1828–1935, p7. [3] Yaxley ML, Davis MW & Dunbar N, editors, The Grand Lodge of Tasmania 1890–1990, p1. [4] Davis MW, ‘The Father of Freemasonry in Tasmania’, Transactions of Hobart Lodge of Research, vol 41 #2 (1988), p20. [5] Principal sources for this section are the publications cited in notes 2–4, above. Where sources differ, Davis’s ‘Father of Freemasonry in Tasmania’ is preferred, unless otherwise indicated. [6] Robson L, History of Tasmania vol 1, p291. [7] Supreme Court records. [8] The diary of Rev Robert Knopwood for 1803–1838 (Tasmanian Historical Research Association) refers to Murray being incarcerated but pardoned by Arthur on 27 July 1827 (diary entries dated 12/3/27 & 15/9/27). [9] correspondence with the Grand Lodge of Ireland. [10] Perhaps whimsically, Rabbi Brasch says: It has been suggested that there is a near affinity between the Australian word cobber and the Hebrew chover, both meaning companion and friend. It may be that from the viewpoint of modern etymology this hypothesis is incorrect. Symbolically, however, nothing could more truthfully describe the friendship of Jew and Gentile in this sunlit country. The Star of David, p295. [11] Wiseman AR, Centenary History of St John’s Lodge 1843 to 1943, pp 11,12. This work is the main Masonic source for this section, since the minutes of the lodge have disappeared. The Jewish aspects are featured in two books: Gordon M, Jews in Van Diemen’s Land, and Levi JS & Bergman GFJ, Australian Genesis, but both are inaccurate in some respects. For a more detailed account, see the present author’s paper ‘The synagogue and the lodge’, delivered to the Launceston Lodge of Research on 14/5/93. [12] Launceston Examiner, 8/3/1843, 24/5/1843, 6/7/1843; Voice of Jacob (London) 24/11/43. [13] Wiseman, Centenary History of St John’s Lodge, pp 17,20,21. [14] Examiner 2/10/1844 p628. [15] Bennett S & Bennett B, Biographical Register of the Tasmanian Parliament 1851–1960, p140. [16]
Gordon M, Jews in Van Diemen’s Land, p76 [17] Church of England burial records, Launceston. [18] Wiseman, Centenary History of St John’s Lodge, p23. |