![]() |
| Rivista di Massoneria - Revue de Franc-Maçonnerie - Revista de Masonerìa - Revista de Maçonaria |
|---|
| History Literature Music Art Architecture Documents Rituals Symbolism |
|
MasonicaRevue du Groupe de Recherche AlpinaGrande Loge Suisse AlpinaN° 19 - 2005
2005, 160 pages. |
![]() |
|
Avant-Propos Cet
opuscule témoigne de vingt ans d’activités d’un groupe de recherche. Il réunit
des textes de chercheurs de lumière. Certains d’entre eux ne sont pas membres
de la Franc-Maçonnerie. Mais la pertinence de leurs textes, la recherche
qu’ils mènent font qu’ils sont appelés, vraisemblablement dans un
chauvinisme bien innocent de notre Ordre, des maçons sans tablier. Nous
faisons dans ce cahier le point sur la recherche maçonnique : sur celle de
notre groupe, mais aussi sur la tendance mondiale des Loges de recherche qui prône
une recherche historique réductrice, épousant le matérialisme ambiant. Sans
aucunement renier les avantages d’une telle méthode, ce cahier insiste plutôt
sur le fondement spirituel de notre mouvement, proche du néoplatonisme, afin de
fournir au Maçon chercheur des réflexions pour son édification spirituelle.
Comment peut-on penser l’Esprit aujourd’hui, ne pas le réduire à une
« fantaisie » volatile de la Matière et donner ainsi au Maçon une
raison d’espérer ? En effet, notre Ordre s’enracine, car il a un but
autre que la collection de symboles et de rites du passé, tout d’abord dans
une perspective évolutive et ascendante dans laquelle le Maçon peut s’intégrer. Le
GRA, comme d’ailleurs l’obédience dont sont issus ses membres (la GLSA),
s’attache à donner du sens au concept du Grand Architecte de l’Univers, le
Soi de l’univers symbolique maçonnique. Cet engagement est primordial, car il
donne une perspective et renforce la spécificité de la Franc-Maçonnerie.
Cette dernière n’est ni un club service, ni une antichambre galvaudée des
Eglises chrétiennes, et, s’il règne avant tout un climat de fraternité et
d’amitié sans vénalité, c’est bien la perfection et l’évolution
spirituelle de ses membres qui est recherché. Mais
ce cahier ne résume pas les options et n’épuise pas les perspectives de
recherche du GRA. En effet, l’objectif du groupe est de donner avant tout matière
à réflexions, de stimuler la curiosité, dans un champ aussi vaste que
possible pour les membres de notre Ordre. Les
textes présentés font l’objet d’une brève introduction, afin de
mettre en perspective l’unité sous-jacente des thèmes traités. Par
ailleurs, certains articles sont suivis de notes fournissant des informations
complémentaires. ![]() Ce volume, publié à l'occasion du vingtième anniversaire de la fondation du groupe de Recherche Alpina, est une synthèse de l'esprit philosophique qui a inspiré ce groupe et qui plus qu'une étude de l'histoire de la Franc Maçonnerie est plutôt un approfondissement de la pensée platonique à la base de la Franc Maçonnerie- même. Bruno Virgilio Gazzo, editor ![]() |
|
To
English-speaking readers over the world. It is well-known that Swiss Masonry speaks and works in one of two major languages, i.e. either French or German, not to speak of Italian, in a far shorter proportion. As Anglo-Saxon Masonry leads and has always led the initiatic movement both historically and numerically, as international Masonic relationships involve frequent and reciprocally enriching exchanges, we felt it only right to demonstrate our fraternal amity by translating at least an excerpt of our spiritual search in Shakespeare’s tongue, as partly revealed in the twentieth anniversary issue of our half-yearly magazine Masonica, released in March 2006. For reasons of timing and cost, the volume was only printed in French (together with its English introductions). If you are familiar with the French language and eager to read it, we would be only too happy to send you a copy free of charge. Our E-mail address: gra@masonica-gra.ch In order for you to grasp the matter of the different articles, we reproduce below their English headings. We sincerely hope our efforts will be appreciated in accordance with the ideals of Masonry, viz. aiming to deploy “…the happy Means of conciliating Persons that otherwise must have remain’d at a perpetual Distance” (Anderson’s Constitutions, art. I). Dr. Jean Bénédict, president and founding member of the Group FOREWORD To
celebrate its twentieth anniversary, the Alpina Research Group (A.R.G.) is
pursuing its search in two separate directions. True
to the purpose of all Masonic research Lodges functioning around the World, the
A.R.G. continues to probe historical facts and phenomena occupying the pole
position of an otherwise materialistically-minded world-wide community. Beyond
this commitment, the A.R.G. seeks a spiritual enlightenment for the Masons of
tomorrow, borrowing from inside and outside the Craft in order to pave a new way
of evolving via up-dated traditional principles, expectations and personal
involvement. THE
A.R.G., TWENTY YEARS IN THE SERVICE OF MASONRY By
Jean Bénédict, Ph.D., founder and President of the A.R.G. Twenty
years of exploration, re-appraisals, and soul-searching have forged a close
community amongst this small group of committed Masons wishing to go somewhat
further than simply portraying inherited truths. Diverse
publications, a half-yearly magazine, a conference cycle, constant exchange with
foreign research Lodges, and a Website exist to lead to better understanding of
today’s challenges and tomorrow’s promises. Symbolism,
although being at the heart of speculative Masons’ lives, does not solve
existential questions. Much more lies ahead. WHICH
MASONIC RESEARCH? By
Michel Jaccard, Ph.D., head editor of the A.R.G. The
Premier Lodge of Research Quatuor
Coronati London has successfully set the pace for over a hundred younger
dedicated research Lodges scattered over the planet. However relatively few
research documents have been published in the domain of modern spiritual
development, leading towards less materialistic and less reductionist approaches. The
neo-platonic coexistence of mysticism and philosophy was swept away by
Christianity in favour of dogmatic theology. The Masonic authors Knoop, Jones
and Hamill having introduced an “authentic” historical approach, their
followers resorted to impoverished methodological analyses whereby comparative
and symbolic studies were neglected. Fields such as psychological analysis,
philosophy, anthropology, comparative religious history, and related spiritual
currents such as hermetics, alchemy, and gnosticism were left to one side as
being occultist or at least abstruse. Thus Anglo-Saxon Masonry, reduced to a
Victorian, moralistic, and religious philanthropy, failed in giving an impetus
towards a remodelled future, which to a great extent explains its massively
brutal membership loss over the last twenty years. As
a spiritual movement, Masonry has to profit from the latest scientific
discoveries in order to modernize its message, otherwise it will disappear. It
is up to research Lodges to validate “Brain and Mind” relationships, and the
goal of our anniversary publication can be regarded as a modest contribution to
this renewal. A
FOCUSING POINT FOR ALL RELIGIONS? By
Prof. Carl Keller, Theological Faculty, Lausanne University Every
religious movement basically contains three levels of involvement: 1) social
ritual and related community activity, 2) spiritual relationship with the
unknown ONE, 3) a supreme mystical identification close to monism but actually
non-dualistic. Frontiers between the three are blurred and the to-and-fro
permeability remains open. In
spite of the extraordinary diversity of differentiated religious systems
encountered among the nations, they all revert to one sole transcendental Centre.
However, if all religions converge ultimately towards this unique Centre, the
personal path to attainment passes through one’s own religion. One can even go
one step further and explore neighbouring systems with great profit. FROM
MODERNISTIC PSYCHOLOGY TO THE TRADITIONAL WHOLE By
Jean-Pierre Schnetzler, Ph.D., Psychiatrist and founder of two Buddhist centres The
teachings of René Guénon relating to Tradition (close to philosophia
perennis) bore the influence of two World Wars: he wished to protect
humanity from a third one merely by transforming Society. All beings were to
engage in intellectual speculation, including constant practical action. After
twenty years of research and teaching, the author has found a new area in which
the teachings of modern psychology (e.g. S. Freud and C.G. Jung) complete and
magnify the steps of spiritual and Masonic practice. Yet, psychology does not
include the vital initiatic component of mystical experience that is
para-psychology, able to transform a being by his liberation. The
author further clarifies the difference between “collective unconscious”,
the subconscious and the supra-conscious levels of perception. Indeed,
psychology and psychoanalysis have contributed greatly in understanding these
phenomena, but have also led to much abuse. The key to the problem is a global
conception encompassing all branches of factual knowledge as well as
metaphysical insights (including alchemy). Thus reappears the antique and
ageless initiatic path, closely related to Buddhism. Surprisingly, the most
original transpersonal psychology was born in California thanks to Ken Wilber. The
author goes on to describe the losses of speculative as opposed to operative
Masonry and contributes proposals destined to make up for lost time. He offers
the following steps: religious practice with daily prayers, intense assimilation
of the ritual (e.g. Emulation by rote), and frequent use of Masonic precepts in
daily life. MEDITATIVE
TECHNIQUES IN A CONTEMPORANEOUS OPERATIVE MASONRY NOW By
Jean-Pierre Schnetzler, Ph.D., Psychiatrist and founder of two Buddhist centres Meditation
is borrowed from the philosophy of Antiquity (especially neo-platonic and stoic)
and from other religious traditions which have maintained spiritual exercises,
Buddhism in particular. First,
ritual ought to be applied intensely, both in speech and gesture. Secondly, wild
uncontrolled mental activity, when not drowsiness, must be systematically
controlled. Thirdly, maintain operational discourse with oneself pertaining to
ones every activity. Meditation
involves an active and very deep introspection of one’s own body, intellect
and spirit. Such techniques are of a universal nature: concentration and
penetrating insight. 1.-
Bodily attention. Strict immobility prevails (in a comfortable, sitting
posture). In Masonic practice every gesture takes on symbolic weight of deep
meaning. One has to mentally grasp each bodily attitude, leaving all
distractions aside. This requires permanent vigilance. 2.-
Meditation “beside oneself”, distant from one’s body as if it were another
person: the non-myself, the death of “Old Adam”, or exactly the objective of
all initiation. 3.-
Letting the spirit rove in its natural, pure state, non-questioning, abandoned
and non-demanding. 4.-
Concentration focuses on one single point (e.g. one degree of the circle),
whereas penetrating insight seizes the entire circle. Pursued to its extreme,
concentration can lead to ecstasy and its positive and negative consequences. 5.-
The next step places emphasis on the observation of one’s breathing, the flow
of air, the regular movement of the rib cage; it is possible to count from one
to ten, and begin again and again. Then concentration focuses on a spot between
the eyes. 6.-
Silent repetition of a divine name or Mantra. Meditation
can thus be practiced with advantage in Masonic work, and in daily life. The
author has successfully led a small group for over fifteen years. The vertical
position (e.g. hand to throat) is a first formal and formative step. The four
Elements (earth, water, fire, air) are used; they also exist in Indian alchemy.
Much more could be said about this technique which will further evolve in future
years. REMEMBRANCE
AND VIRTUE IN PLATO’S “MENON” By
Irène Mainguy, Masonic author, chief librarian of the GODF Socrates’
method of questions and answers, bringing about his discovery that he knows
nothing is described in this less known book. The dialogue incites the subject
to seek inside himself the way to master his emotions, to discover the truth and
the light deep inside. This give-and-take still exists in Masonic ritual today. The
dialogue pursues its analysis defining virtue: every human activity is put to
the test of determining whether and how it is virtuous and just. Socrates
concludes that it is impossible to define virtue – unless remembrance is
called upon. Personal experience results from gathered evidence and examples.
But consciousness is made up of interiority, truth, and transcendence, the fruit
of intense efforts and allows the discovery of enlightenment. This dialogue
makes it possible to re-invent (remembrance): in reality knowledge is
re-collection, and ignorance stems from forgetfulness. The knowledge of the
Truth is there, confusedly, and it would suffice to find it anew amongst an
array of imagination, habits, and obscurities. THE
ART OF MEMORY AND THE SYMBOLIC LANGUAGE OF FREEMASONRY By
Jean-Daniel Graf, Ph.D., active member and co-editor of the ARG Francis
Yates in her book “The Art of Memory” (1966) retraces the art of memorizing
from Antiquity – when all knowledge had to be learnt by heart – up to the 16th
Century. The philosopher Paul Ricoeur considers two sorts of memory: natural
memory (spontaneous and involuntary), and artificial (voluntary and forced). Artificial
memory was codified by Cicero, Quintilius and an anonymous Roman rhetorician,
who invented mnemonics. First one would memorize the architecture of a vast and
varied building, to be used for hundreds of speeches. Thus one would mentally
place different emblematic objects, parts of discourse, words, ideas, phrases,
etc. in each room that would be recalled by association, since eyesight is the
strongest of the senses. This
tradition expired at the end of the 5th Century, only to be
re-awakened by Albert le Grand and Saint Thomas in the 13th Century.
Cicero had already considered memory as being part of Prudence, one of the four
aspects of Virtue (i.e. Prudence, Justice, Constance, Temperance). Abstract
ideas being difficult to memorize, it becomes evident that their association
with images renders their recall much easier. For didactic reasons, the Middle
Ages needed the use of images to indoctrinate churchgoers more effectively. This
appears evident in religious statuary and imaging, both painted and stained
glass representations, being able to stimulate emotions, as Cicero had already
pleaded. Renaissance
influence bred a new venture financed by the French king Francis 1st:
the Theatre of Memory built by Giulio Camillo Delminio (born around 1480). The
theatre was large enough to enable a person to stand on the stage and observe
objects. The wooden theatre had a classical hemicycle shape, with seven levels
(the Creation, with 7 steps from the realm of Ideas to the material world’s 7
planets) and 7 sectors (7 supra-celestial Sephiroth, as well as 7 planets); the
49 intersections (representing the Cosmos) had doors painted with images, with,
at their base, drawers and chests containing texts relating to the images. This
neo-platonic scholastic structure bore esoteric conceptions derived from Hermès
Trismegistus, mythological roots, encyclopaedic aspirations, and magical
implications, all centred on the Memory of the World. Along
a similar vein, Giordano Bruno (1548-1600), a Neapolitan monk, invented a
circular system of 150 Seals offering an infinite array of combinations. Both a
memory and archetypal introspection method, as well as a magical talisman
technique, Bruno’s invention is typically neo-platonic. In
Masonry, especially with Emulation ritual, the role of memory is most important,
not only in speech, but also in gesture transmissions of symbolic teachings. The
influence of Pythagoras and Plato is evident. Here
the art of operative builders is as important as the hermetic teachings. The
Schaw Statutes contain proof that Camillo’s and Bruno’s heritage crossed the
Channel to influence and forge Scottish Masonry. Close
relationships have been made with Tantric and Buddhist meditation, which induces
a modification to mental functioning. A
UNIVERSAL MYSTIQUE? By
Hervé Krief, Rabbi of the Lausanne Community Saint
Thomas defined mystique or mysticism as being cognito
Dei experimentalis. Thus mystique is of universal character. It is present
in every one of us: we have an intuitive knowledge of God, largely transformed
by an ever-present materialism. Religion
is irreplaceable in finding God. But once acquired, thinking becomes independent
of religious context. Intuition cannot convey this feeling and paradisiacal
status cannot convey such a feeling, and paradisiacal status leads to nothing.
Nostalgic of this primordial existence, man needs to recreate harmony with God
in a dualistic relationship. This he does by learning, by assimilating the idea
of an immanency, bringing about mystic experience. In
this respect, universal mystique is impossible without religious content,
whichever it may be. Acceding to God in absence of a religion is bound to fail. EN
SOPH – EN REICHIT: KABALA AND FREEMASONRY By
Michel Warnery, Vice-President and co-editor of the A.R.G. The
Kabala (Tradition) was born around 1180 in south-eastern France as an esoteric
branch of Judaism in the form of a document (Sepher ha Bahir) until the Zohar
(Moise de Léon) replaced it about 1300, a neo-pythagoric and neo-platonic
Gnostic movement. Whereas Judaism was always opposed to images and symbols so
pervasive within the world of myths, the Kabala nurtured a profusion of mystical
representations. Averroes the Arab, contemporaneous to Maïmonides the Jew,
heightened the confusion in this 13th Century but also aided
intellectuals desirous of finding the “Keys to the Kingdom”. Many
teachings of the Kabala – more specifically the Sephiroth Tree – penetrated
Masonry directly or indirectly. En Soph (without end) and En Reichit (without
beginning) encompass all divine existence. Such a concept made its way into
Masonry (the search of one’s self), the Sephiroth Tree guiding both the
candidate and the initiated Mason. This defies rational description, since
intimate revelation of a relation with divinity cannot be explained and remains
a personal secret. The
Sephiroth Tree is truly anthropomorphic. Similar images can be found in the
ground plans of the Temple of Luxor and the Hindi chakras. Further, the Tree is
present at the position of all officers of the Lodge, whatever the rite, as well
as the positions of one’s initiatic itinerary. SHIBBOLETH,
THE LETTER SCHIN OR THE ALCHEMISTIC SIGNIFICATION OF MASONIC HEBRAISMS By
Remo Boggio, Ph.D., active member of the A.R.G. The
password used in the second Degree has two meanings: “ear of corn” and
“water”, in reference to a biblical tale (Japheth and the Ephraimites). Water,
ocean, river, all have symbolic connotations and alchemical equivalents.
Shibboleth, according to its two different pronunciations, combines Water and
Fire. Its first letter – Shin – represents Fire. The two other
Mother-letters (Aleph – Air, Mem – Water) cover three of the four initiatic
Elements. This illustrates the close relationship between neo-platonic notions,
alchemy, and the Kabala (Sepher Yetsira). The fourth Element, Earth, takes on a
relatively material value, that of harbouring the corn which dies (thanks to
Water and Fire) in order to give birth to a new ear of corn (initiatic rebirth). The
author also emphasizes the symbolic value of 42 (42’000 Ephraimites), the
Beast of the Apocalypse. He finally brings into light the numerous symbolic
interactions between the different ancient traditions and explains their meaning
in the initiatic process. FAITH
OF RELIGIONS AND PERSONAL FAITH, A WAY TOWARDS COMMUNION OF SPIRITUALITIES FOR
THE ACCOMPLISHMENT OF HUMANITY By
Father Bernard Feillet Father
Feillet offers his own vision of philosophia perennis by asking at the outset: “Who am I, facing
God? Who is God for me?” The questions are as acute today as at the beginning
of Humanity: which unexplored areas now remain? Just as a bird takes its flight,
my own flight into the sky belongs to me. All religions (Christian, Hebraic,
Islamic) offer temporary and partial answers, inasmuch as none can deliver the
Truth, for this Truth about God cannot be revealed through the discourse of any
religion. As God has never spoken directly to mankind, men had to speak in his
stead. This speech (Revelation) was meant for mankind and it engendered in his
heart an echo of divinity. Its contradictions reflect those of humanity: its
complexity and multiplicity are in direct contrast to the simplicity and unity
of God. Their
creators are, in each religion, true prophets, unique but necessary to the birth
of God on Earth. Each of us is in a position to renew such prophesising,
otherwise religions would have disappeared. If
Jesus is my own prophet, others around the planet have the capacity of being of
God. Each one of us can reveal, “What is his own, yet more than himself” (Marcel
Légaut). In
order to accompany the faith of believers, all religions have attempted to make
God speak and have clothed themselves in his authority and power, over a period
of more than 4000 years. This breeds the question: That which has made faith
possible for 4000 years, will it not prevent the faith of future humanity? After
over forty years of Christian experience and action, the author has evolved
towards a passion for humanity’s spiritual future through human encounters,
only to discover the signs of divinity in each being. There
being no beginning without an end, each new generation stands at the roots of
faith, at the possibility of faith, ever new and never identical with the
precedent. Its creative dynamism escapes all those that would want to control
it. This faith reveals the bewildering status of man, of his mystery as well as
that of God, which are the one and only mystery, infinite and permanent.
Man discovers his lowly state. The
horrors of History, man’s capacity of destruction, have made him doubt his
humanity. They have revealed that destruction of man and of God reside in the
same and unique disaster. Capable of annihilating, in its bosom, the mystery of
God, humanity being the matrix of the divine is also capable of generating both
faith in man and in God. Desire entertains in our hearts a passion for the
impossible. This impossibility widens in inverse proportion to the capacity for
religions to exert a collective power. What is now expected of them is to
contemplate the spirituality of humanity as a whole, to escape the confinement
of idolatry, to tolerate diversified forms of religious life, to evolve by
successive small steps in order to attain a larger Truth. What
prevails in all religions is without doubt the question of Love. But the utmost
challenge is that of Faith, since the faith of Jesus is not the same as mine.
Each religion pursues its own growth for itself and that of the universal
mystery of God. The
Alpina Research Group, March 2006 |